On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:53:31 -0400 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 05:43:22PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > And I hope this fix can get a freeze exception: by the way, I think > > that "normal" severity is too low for this bug report, I would raise it > > to at least "important"... > > The release team will look at the bugs,
Sure. > artificially pushing up the > severity assumes the release-team won't take a critical look at what's > changed. What I meant was not suggesting to "artificially" raise the severity: I really think that the correct severity for this bug is "important", since it does have a major effect on the usability of the package. However, I am not the original bug report submitter, nor a maintainer of this package: I will leave to you to decide whether the severity should be changed... > > It's early in the cycle and this isn't a vanity package. We should have > no problem, assuming they are bugfixes. Good! Thanks a lot for your prompt reply. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp3jfuf0pJbB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
