On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:20:58PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Jonathan Nieder dixit: > > >It seems like Osamu experienced an unsuccessful upgrade (tracking > >sid), but I admit I'm hazy on the details. > > Hm. I’ve not experienced this on my systems (amd64 and m68k), > tracking sid. (But then, I usually purge aptitude first thing.) > And, to be honest, I’d not care about this if it doesn’t affect > squeeze → wheezy updates, either. > > >I'm hoping we will be able to address it (once we know what "it" is > >;)) by adding a transitional xz-lzma package that depends on xz-utils > >and making the Conflicts/Replaces by xz-utils versioned. > > This adds an ugly complexity I thought you were trying to avoid… > and I don’t personally believe it necessary, but let’s see what > the actual problems were.
xz-lzma have reverse depends in archive that are now maybe broken python-apt (recommends) gdebi-core,reprepro (suggests) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
