reassign 677607 texlive-base
close 677607 2012.20120529-1 # at least, I am to lazy to check the right ver
thanks
On Fr, 15 Jun 2012, Iain Lane wrote:
> I get an upgrade failure when trying to go from 3.11 3.12:
Aehmmmm ...
> ii texlive-base 2011.20120410-1
Can you PLEASE update ... this version has been superseeded by now
already 5 times.
Furthermore, 0410 never made it into testing, and was soon after succeeded
by 0424.
texlive-base (2012.20120611-1) unstable; urgency=low
texlive-base (2012.20120529-1) unstable; urgency=low
texlive-base (2012.20120516-1) unstable; urgency=low
texlive-base (2011.20120509-1) unstable; urgency=low
texlive-base (2011.20120424-1) unstable; urgency=low
texlive-base (2011.20120410-1) unstable; urgency=low
You cannot expect to get decent behaviour if you use version of packages
not even in the archive since ages anymore.
And Julian:
On Fr, 15 Jun 2012, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> That's bizarre. updmap comes from texlive-binaries; which version of
No, it comes from texlive-base, in effect, telxive-binaries only
ship a link into nothing ;-) I know, but I don't care for now.
THe real file is updmap.pl which is shipped in texlive-base.
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUDE
A polite joke reserved for use in the presence of vicars.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
