Hey, On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:35:40PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:56:21AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > > The contents of that file are: > > > > ,---- > > | Can't locate TeXLive/TLUtils.pm in @INC (@INC contains: //tlpkg > > | /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5. > > | 14.2 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 > > | /usr/share/perl/5.14 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/bin/updmap l > > | ine 21. > > | BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/updmap line 21. > > `---- > > > > I don't think I've messed with @INC. Pointers on where to look welcomed. > > That's bizarre. updmap comes from texlive-binaries; which version of > that do you have installed? My version of updmap reads, on line 32:
I have: ,---- | laney@polihale> apt-cache policy texlive-binaries | texlive-binaries: | Installed: 2012.20120516-1 | Candidate: 2012.20120530-2+b1 | Version table: | 2012.20120530-2+b1 0 | 500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ testing/main i386 Packages | 500 ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages | *** 2012.20120516-1 0 | 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status `---- but I can't upgrade to the new version, because of the depends on tex-common which cannot be satisfied due to this bug. :-) > > unshift (@INC, "/usr/share/texlive/tlpkg"); > > What does yours read? ,---- | BEGIN { | $^W=1; | chomp($TEXMFROOT = `kpsewhich -var-value=TEXMFROOT`); | unshift (@INC, "$TEXMFROOT/tlpkg"); | } `---- Probably this changed in the later version, if you're seeing some different code. And indeed running that command gives "/" as a result. Can tex-common be made more robust against failure of updmap? It's not a depends there so must not be entirely required — maybe you don't need to fail the installation? Thanks, -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ] PhD student [ i...@cs.nott.ac.uk ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
