Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:10:59PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Mark Brown wrote:
>>> It's the fact that this isn't being shipped - having to run autoreconf >>> at all isn't confidence inspiring, as well as being a pain to actually >>> do while packaging. > >> This was discussed on the zlib list: [1]. I think others are using it >> (i.e., this is not a sign that it is completely untested :)). > > Clearly people have looked when it went in, but ongoing... Oh, sorry for the confusion. I meant that having to run autoreconf was discussed, and then I switched topics. I agree that this build system for the shared library is new, and it takes time to build trust and prove it can continue to be maintained well. Anyway, that's enough comments for now from me. Thanks again. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
