Mark Brown wrote: > It's the fact that this isn't being shipped - having to run autoreconf > at all isn't confidence inspiring, as well as being a pain to actually > do while packaging.
This was discussed on the zlib list: [1]. I think others are using it (i.e., this is not a sign that it is completely untested :)). dh_autoreconf from the dh-autoreconf package seems to do an ok job of regenerating configure and cleaning up when done, using an ugly hack explained in the package description. > I'll try to have a look once I'm happy the rest of > the package is locked down for the next release, Thanks. FWIW I agree that this is something more for wheezy+1. No one would have time to start using the shared library before wheezy is released anyway. And that provides some time to work on adding symbol versioning upstream. Ciao, Jonathan [1] http://mail.madler.net/pipermail/zlib-devel_madler.net/2012-January/002697.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
