On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Torsten Landschoff <t.landsch...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 05/24/2012 09:23 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> >> Package: swig2.0 >> Version: 2.0.6-1 >> Severity: important >> >> >> Due to the recent regression in 2.0.5 and 2.0.6, I suggest that 2.0.7 be >> available for Wheezy. >> >> ref: >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29305946 >> >> ... >> That very much depends on your code. I wouldn't suggest anything else >> other than rebuild everything. Also there is another serious typemap bug >> in 2.0.5 which will be addressed in 2.0.7. I hope that Debian upgrade >> directly to 2.0.7 which will be released by end of week. >> > Sorry, I just uploaded 2.0.6-1 which I forgot to upload after building. But > I will upgrade the package to 2.0.7 as soon as it comes out.
No problem ! swig 2.0.4/2.0.5/2.0.6 have been a mess anyway :) What scares me is that we may introduce swig 2.0.5/2.0.6 bug into debian packages that will be hard to track since there is no way to know if a binary was built with swig 2.0.5/2.0.6 or not... -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
