We discussed this a couple days ago on IRC and I'm pretty sure we concluded that this isn't that big of a deal for us. I think Ron talked to haxar in #xiph and he may have a patch that he can send us that we can just stick in in our upstream and release a new source version.
This is easy enough for us to do, especially if you have a patch. Otherwise, I'm sure haxar can take care of this pretty quick. As for trac... it finally died. I'm still trying to figure out what to do for new bug tracking software. -eric On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Vincent Cheng <vincentc1...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Vincent Cheng <vincentc1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Eric and Daniel, > > > > For all the necessary background information, please refer to bug > > #674244 in the Debian BTS [1]. Essentially, celt is being removed from > > Debian in favour of opus, for various reasons as described in that bug > > report. > > > > Do you have any plans to replace celt support with opus in > > mangler/libventrilo? I have no idea how much work this would entail, > > nor how to port something from celt to opus to begin with, so I've > > cc:'ed Ron (the maintainer of opus in Debian) for his input; feel free > > to ask him if you have any questions about opus. > > > > As a side note, www.mangler.org/trac just gives me a 404. Where did > trac go? > > > > Best regards, > > Vincent (mangler's Debian maintainer) > > > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/674244 > > Oops, wrong e-mail address? The AUTHORS file should probably be > updated, given that econn...@mangler.org doesn't seem to be a valid > address... > > Vincent >
