-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23/05/12 09:48, Niels Thykier wrote: > Revisiting this, couldn't we use Double.compare(double, double) > for this? This way we should be safe from changes (if any) in how > doubles are handled in the future as well as any changes to the > standard (possible exceptions include allowing the use "NaN" or > "INF" values).
Actually that's much nicer - I'll update to use that method. Thanks for pointing that out. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPvLk0AAoJEL/srsug59jDqNgQAJxqstr9yBdKNHiN44ZV0yte jQdjNNMMR9e92367WKHsjwLugRO1R/7t2pqLLub1pw8aYam0idTwKrlT4S6NN4T/ ztfzcW1yBxZPkhK0YMBgeG0GMm+YBrnWkvI7zYYLtGd5XsRwVDT96rcXKEGOj/ms kZmS4aiPovk2xk39SIfbGHoJ/I4Iv5Y/PI4mgO1OqRSLNpQPAE8DL52mZCKtlF/Z Ms2LlFUDPsiuYo7o1Bfd76qDvm9zE8MmywXVImCh6izSeP0lefrARpReEN79kAZc ox/l4aI87ThC+7QI4iTPFdoTFRuvmkbOUwSB4z7RbvN32lK9qNsvLsZvwy9rGpBV V6Azc0na6NG6eeCX+Na+mW/26THO7ecntRaPyJw5zhQhq/WLXl/lqsS7oHz/SpKI 4gpq8O5Ig2OeicM44NmXobAcaalXAgL9rZJNa4HPeyKaurZHOpcMfsfPg7qj3Ski sMn3+U2r2xFEYWLHkG4CHEquJGvq0uY+7KLV07hNMjbSlMCH86cI44KJzA2hna9X V1JAwhdNB7VOk5HaV6ZvPzOVqB2a38u9hqf8yy1KJiNFoR4YfQxDVIW0vEWswaCy EdbTGduq3n1QE4gm8TydZJvXQB7ofrAGJkQjT2/hgz/Z2Nor2lQ5Yd9G/ij8As6u gVri/zU7dDctD9AfpRRl =4iD3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
