Clint Adams wrote: > The relevant part is that it's absurd for ghc to Breaks any linker > at all.
Based on the English language meaning of "Breaks", I agree. Would Conflicts have been a better suggestion? I marked the bug as RC because one package is broken when the other is installed but the package manager allows it, which is something policy ยง3.5 is meant to prevent. It all seems academic, though, unless configuring ghc to use ld.bfd is very difficult for some reason. [...] > Unless you mean ticket #6063, I'm not sure. I meant #4862. Thanks for clarifying, and sorry for the fuss. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
