Clint Adams wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:58:22PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> I think it's a serious bug, but it could be fixed after the release if >> you want. Would it be problematic to make an upload that either >> changes the linker used to ld.bfd or (less pleasant) adds a Breaks >> against binutils-gold? > > Don't you mean that binutils-gold Breaks ghc? Not really. I mean that ghc Depends on !binutils-gold because its configure script is too zealous in adopting features from the linker it happens to be built against, but there's not any way to express that in debian/control. A proper long-term fix is probably to check the linker's functionality at run time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
