On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 16:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Which shows that the segfault is always at the same code address: > > > > [ 56.663596] lvm[540]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 > > sp 00007fff25461ec8 error 5 > > [ 76.174282] exe[541]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 > > sp 00007fffa69b3388 error 5 > > [ 78.307062] exe[542]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 > > sp 00007fff33270d08 error 5 > > [ 87.775183] exe[543]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 > > sp 00007ffffb125068 error 5 > > [ 97.937356] exe[545]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 > > sp 00007fffb53be498 error 5 > > [ 108.789157] lvm[547]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 > > sp 00007fff0e012348 error 5 > > > > This address is not accessible in user-mode, and probably isn't used by > > the kernel either. > > Nice lead. Looks like > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1248253/focus=1254330
Agreed. Rik, which version of the kernel is the hypervisor from?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed.
- Carolyn Scheppner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
