Ben Hutchings wrote: > Which shows that the segfault is always at the same code address: > > [ 56.663596] lvm[540]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 sp > 00007fff25461ec8 error 5 > [ 76.174282] exe[541]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 sp > 00007fffa69b3388 error 5 > [ 78.307062] exe[542]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 sp > 00007fff33270d08 error 5 > [ 87.775183] exe[543]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 sp > 00007ffffb125068 error 5 > [ 97.937356] exe[545]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 sp > 00007fffb53be498 error 5 > [ 108.789157] lvm[547]: segfault at ffffffffff600400 ip ffffffffff600400 sp > 00007fff0e012348 error 5 > > This address is not accessible in user-mode, and probably isn't used by > the kernel either.
Nice lead. Looks like http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1248253/focus=1254330 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
