tags 311044 wontfix
thanks

pe, 2005-09-30 kello 16:17 +0200, Lubos Lunak kirjoitti:
> On Thursday 22 of September 2005 16:34, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > pe, 2005-09-02 kello 08:46 +0200, Chris Vanden Berghe kirjoitti:
> > > The wishlist-bug I opened proposes a 'toggle' option (next to the
> > > existing 'on' and 'off' options) that changes the numlock state.  So,
> > > turns it off when it's on, and turns it on when it's off.
> >
> > That wishlist concerns the upstream software, not the Debian packaging,
> > so I'm hereby forwarding him the idea.
> 
>  The very first version of numlockx actually works only that way, so you can 
> use just that: http://www.linux.cz/lists/archive/linux/68637.html . But quite 
> frankly I don't quite see the point of being able to flip the state.

Me neither.  

This software's purpose is not to compensate for a broken key, it is  to
automatically enable the NumLock status whenever starting an X session.

I don't oppose the addition of this toggle feature, but I honestly don't
see the need for it either.

However... 

I notice that the bug reporter's intended usage goes one step beyond:
it would add an applet to either KDE or GNOME's taskbar to toggle the
status of the NumLock key.  That feels more involved.

Anyhow, if someone ever submits a patch to upstream that adds the toggle
action, without affecting current behaviour, I will gladly package it.

-- 
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi


Reply via email to