(2012-03-28 22:02 +0100), Reuben Thomas wrote: > 2012/3/28 Hiroyuki Yamamoto <yama1...@gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> CTRL-C is already supported by -e option, not "default." > > But this makes no sense: "sl" is a command usually typed by mistake, > so of course I will not add the -e option (which doesn't even exist > for "ls"). The whole point of the other options, -l, -a and -F, is > that they are common options to "ls". And while it's sometimes > enjoyable to watch the train complete its journey, other times I just > want to stop it (particularly if I have a terminal the full width of > my screen!). And who ever heard of a non-interactive program that only > optionally supported ^C?
While this package, of course, is a joke software, it is also a mistake type reform software on form. I have thought it needs not to support only CTRL-C but also CTRL-Z by default. However, when CTRL-Z was not supported, either, I thought over whether it was inconvenience too much. But I believe yet that it needs not to support CTRL-C by default. -- Hiroyuki Yamamoto A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
