On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:46:50AM +0100, Eugen Dedu wrote: > On 24/03/12 10:47, Stephen Kitt wrote: > >On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:29:49 +0100, Stephen Kitt<st...@sk2.org> wrote: > >>* dxerr9.h is odd - are you sure it's meant to be included without including > >> other DirectX headers? > > > >It turns out dxerr9.h also requires windows.h to be included. > > Have you checked that by compiling on Windows? Or have you seen it > on msdn, and if yes, at which address?
I checked it on Windows, using Visual C++ 2008 with an older DirectX SDK. I also checked dxerr.h (dxerr9.h's replacement in current DirectX SDKs) and windns.h using Visual C++ 2010 and got the same result. Regards, Stephen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
