On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:03:22PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > > Tom, could you please downgrade this bug report to ``wishlist''? > > > I'm not convinced it is wishlist, > > You're the maintainer, so it's up to you. > > (My argument is that normal and important imply it's a bug in Polipo. > I see this as a feature request, as the users are requesting that > polipo should implement the feature of working around a server bug. > Feature requests, AFAIK, are wishlist bugs.)
Yeah, I'm inclined to agree with you. I don't like the idea of disobeying protocols to comminicate with buggy clients or servers, generally. However, I'm also concerned about users, and people are inclined to see this as a bug in Polipo, and perhaps not use it as a result. Nonetheless, my Principle of Least Action[1] tells me to leave the bug as it is and patch with a backport, when that's available. Cheers, Tom [1] Not to be confused with the *actual* principle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
