Your message dated Tue, 27 May 2025 21:53:58 +0000 with message-id <e1uk2fc-004hqu...@respighi.debian.org> and subject line unblock dpkg has caused the Debian Bug report #1104823, regarding pre-approval/unblock: dpkg/1.22.19 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1104823: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104823 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please pre-approve/unblock package dpkg. [ Reason ] This is a minor update including: - Translation updates. - Allocation failure fixes. - Support for the tag2upload OpenPGP keyring. - New PureOS Perl vendor module (not affecting Debian, but removes the only delta they carry around, AFAIR). - Fixes for the OpenPGP backend commands tests. - Support for OpenPGP verification-only command sqv (equivalent to gpgv), so that for example dpkg-source can verify (upstream, and .dsc) again on a minimal system (after apt switched from gpgv to sqv). [ Impact ] The most important part would be not being able to verify source packages by default. The allocation failures might trigger segfaults. The PureOS vendor module could be omitted if deemed excessive. [ Tests ] The apparently more intrusive part (the OpenPGP backend addition) is covered by tests, which also got fixed, but in the end the bulk of the modifications are comments with references to upstream reports. [ Risks ] The changes seem pretty safe to me, and are not really big, I've been running with these for a while, and as mentioned above pass all unit and functional tests. [ Checklist ] [√] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [√] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [√] attach debdiff against the package in testing [ Other info ] I've included the entire debdiff (compressed) against the previous version, the following is the recipe that filters all auto-generated and translation changes: $ xzcat dpkg-1.22.18-1.22.19.debdiff \ | filterdiff \ -x '*.po' -x '*.pot' -x '*/man/*/*.pod' \ -x '*.in' -x '*/configure' -x '*/build-aux/*' -x '*/src/at/*' \ # EOC unblock dpkg/1.22.19 Thanks, Guillem
dpkg-1.22.18-1.22.19.debdiff.xz
Description: application/xz
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Unblocked.
--- End Message ---