Your message dated Tue, 27 May 2025 21:53:58 +0000
with message-id <e1uk2fc-004hqu...@respighi.debian.org>
and subject line unblock dpkg
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104823,
regarding pre-approval/unblock: dpkg/1.22.19
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1104823: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104823
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please pre-approve/unblock package dpkg.

[ Reason ]

This is a minor update including:

  - Translation updates.
  - Allocation failure fixes.
  - Support for the tag2upload OpenPGP keyring.
  - New PureOS Perl vendor module (not affecting Debian, but removes
    the only delta they carry around, AFAIR).
  - Fixes for the OpenPGP backend commands tests.
  - Support for OpenPGP verification-only command sqv (equivalent to
    gpgv), so that for example dpkg-source can verify (upstream, and
    .dsc) again on a minimal system (after apt switched from gpgv to
    sqv).

[ Impact ]

The most important part would be not being able to verify source
packages by default.

The allocation failures might trigger segfaults.

The PureOS vendor module could be omitted if deemed excessive.

[ Tests ]

The apparently more intrusive part (the OpenPGP backend addition) is
covered by tests, which also got fixed, but in the end the bulk of the
modifications are comments with references to upstream reports.

[ Risks ]

The changes seem pretty safe to me, and are not really big, I've been
running with these for a while, and as mentioned above pass all unit
and functional tests.

[ Checklist ]

  [√] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [√] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [√] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]

I've included the entire debdiff (compressed) against the previous
version, the following is the recipe that filters all auto-generated
and translation changes:

  $ xzcat dpkg-1.22.18-1.22.19.debdiff \
    | filterdiff \
      -x '*.po' -x '*.pot' -x '*/man/*/*.pod' \
      -x '*.in' -x '*/configure' -x '*/build-aux/*' -x '*/src/at/*' \
    # EOC


unblock dpkg/1.22.19

Thanks,
Guillem

Attachment: dpkg-1.22.18-1.22.19.debdiff.xz
Description: application/xz


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Unblocked.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to