Your message dated Tue, 27 May 2025 21:48:11 +0000
with message-id <e1uk29b-004htf...@respighi.debian.org>
and subject line unblock archivemount
has caused the Debian Bug report #1106403,
regarding unblock: archivemount/1b-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1106403: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: archivemo...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:archivemount
Please unblock package archivemount
[ Reason ]
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=archivemount says
No tests, superficial or marked flaky
which appears to be because the tests need FUSE
and thus the autopkgtests need isolation-machine
which the runners don't have
which means the tests are SKIPped.
[ Impact ]
This is a targeted fix for archives with files with 7-bit-ASCII names.
archivemount 1a discarded them,
archivemount 1b works around the libarchive API to correctly interpret
them in all-or-the-vast-majority of cases.
[ Tests ]
This passes the automated tests when run directly,
and I've tested the binary package against the originally-reported archive
https://todo.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/archivemount-ng/2#event-416012
as well as other previously-non-functional variants.
[ Risks ]
The code is trivial, leaf package,
this is the currently-endorsed SOP for working around the API.
[ Checklist ]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
[ Other info ]
Don't think so.
unblock archivemount/1b-1
diff -Nru archivemount-1a/archivemount.cpp archivemount-1b/archivemount.cpp
--- archivemount-1a/archivemount.cpp 2024-12-21 16:45:25.000000000 +0100
+++ archivemount-1b/archivemount.cpp 2025-05-14 15:34:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <archive.h>
#include <archive_entry.h>
#include <cinttypes>
+#include <clocale> // TODO: drop; https://todo.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/archivemount-ng/2
#include <dirent.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
@@ -2207,6 +2208,8 @@
}
int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
+ std::setlocale(LC_ALL, ""); // TODO: drop; https://todo.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/archivemount-ng/2
+
struct stat st;
int oldwd = -1;
struct fuse_args args = FUSE_ARGS_INIT(argc, argv);
diff -Nru archivemount-1a/debian/changelog archivemount-1b/debian/changelog
--- archivemount-1a/debian/changelog 2024-12-21 16:00:13.000000000 +0100
+++ archivemount-1b/debian/changelog 2025-05-14 16:06:03.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+archivemount (1b-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream version 1b (+ changelog & NEWS)
+ Closes: #1105758
+
+ -- наб <nabijaczlew...@nabijaczleweli.xyz> Wed, 14 May 2025 16:06:03 +0200
+
archivemount (1a-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* d/tests/test: shebang /bin/test(?!) -> /bin/sh
diff -Nru archivemount-1a/debian/changelog.upstream archivemount-1b/debian/changelog.upstream
--- archivemount-1a/debian/changelog.upstream 2024-12-21 16:00:13.000000000 +0100
+++ archivemount-1b/debian/changelog.upstream 2025-05-14 16:06:03.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+1b I'm digging on how that sounded
+
+ Fixed:
+ * Files with non-ASCII filenames being discarded
+ worked around by running setlocale(LC_ALL, "") ‒
+ $WHATEVER.UTF-8 will have the highest likelyhood of working
+ (https://todo.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/archivemount-ng/2)
+ (Reported-by: ~vitaly-zdanevich)
+
1a Can we just lay here and exist
New:
diff -Nru archivemount-1a/debian/NEWS.upstream archivemount-1b/debian/NEWS.upstream
--- archivemount-1a/debian/NEWS.upstream 2024-12-21 16:00:13.000000000 +0100
+++ archivemount-1b/debian/NEWS.upstream 2025-05-14 16:06:03.000000000 +0200
@@ -100,3 +100,61 @@
--hga62tz56aerqtnx--
+From nabijaczlew...@nabijaczleweli.xyz Wed May 14 16:04:04 2025
+Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 16:04:04 +0200
+From: =?utf-8?B?0L3QsNCx?= <nabijaczlew...@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
+To: ~nabijaczleweli/archivemount...@lists.sr.ht
+Cc: Vitaly Zdanevich <zdanevich.vit...@ya.ru>
+Subject: archivemount-ng 1b released
+Message-ID: <3rhqkbbnupg55suehuq7x4jimerwo6xbwedfjbkej7g3vvk...@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aqajqkzupn4wajki"
+Content-Disposition: inline
+User-Agent: NeoMutt/20231221-2-4202cf-dirty
+
+
+--aqajqkzupn4wajki
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+Source tarball (and signature, same as this mail)
+and detailed changelog can be obtained from
+ https://git.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/archivemount-ng/refs/1b
+
+This release consists of a targeted work-around
+for libarchive hiding files with non-ASCII names:
+ https://todo.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/archivemount-ng/2
+ https://bugs.debian.org/1105758
+
+Still, to get non-ASCII names,
+the locale needs to be configured correctly,
+such that all the filenames could be rendered as text
+AND ALSO be in Unicode I think?
+or the filenames must be /decodable/ as text in the current locale?
+(the LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 family works, but ru_RU.KOI8-R doesn't,
+ even if the filenames only include KOI8-R characters).
+It's not good, but LC_ALL=$whatever.UTF-8 will work for most archives.
+
+--aqajqkzupn4wajki
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+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+=eOWH
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--aqajqkzupn4wajki--
+
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Unblocked.
--- End Message ---
