Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2022 23:53:31 +0200
with message-id <b58554a9-9b2c-7438-a4a2-dbb269742...@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1020763: texlive-full: EB Garamond not installed
properly
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020763,
regarding texlive-full: EB Garamond not installed properly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1020763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-full
Version: 2022.20220722-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: harald.j...@uni-klu.ac.at
Dear Maintainer,
when installing texlive-full into debian testing the EB Garmond fonts seem to
be not installed correctly. Not all ligatures are available, the bold face does
not even have a dash ...
I put a minimal example to
http://wwwu.aau.at/hjele/texlive_vs_debian_testing/wut.zip
Compile the wut.tex via lualatex
2 pdfs are included.
One is the output of a current texlive portable installation.
One comes from a up to date debian testing.
Thx Harald
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have problems with
combination of packages in a LaTeX document, please consult your
local TeX User Group, the comp.text.tex user group, the author of
the original .sty file, or any other help resource.
In particular, bugs that are related to up-upstream, i.e., neither
Debian nor TeX Live (upstream), but the original package authors,
will be closed immediately.
*** The Debian TeX Team is *not* a LaTeX Help Desk ***
If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries
(latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong
output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the
error in your report.
Please run your example with
(pdf)latex -recorder ...
(or any other program that supports -recorder) and send us the generated
file with the extension .fls, it lists all the files loaded during
the run and can easily explain problems induced by outdated files in
your home directory.
Don't forget to also include minimal examples of other files that are
needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps
to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures!
If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of
output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem),
you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that
can be found at
http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini-en.html (english)
or
http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini.html (german)
##################################
minimal input file
##################################
other files
######################################
List of ls-R files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3380 Sep 26 09:33 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Sep 4 2021 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jul 25 16:02 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jul 25 16:02 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
######################################
Config files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Sep 22 12:23 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Jul 25 16:02 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ->
/var/lib/texmf/fmtutil.cnf-DEBIAN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Jul 25 16:02 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ->
/var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5130 Sep 22 12:23
/var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat
######################################
Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Sep 4 2021 mktex.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Sep 22 12:23 texmf.cnf
######################################
md5sums of texmf.d
ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU thread; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de_AT:de
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages texlive-full depends on:
ii asymptote 2.83+ds-1
ii biber 2.18-1
ii chktex 1.7.6-5
ii cm-super 0.3.4-17
ii context 2021.03.05.20220211-1
ii dvidvi 1.0-8.2+b1
ii dvipng 1.15-1.1+b1
ii feynmf 1.08-13
ii fragmaster 1.7-10
ii info 6.8-6
ii lacheck 1.26-17
ii latex-cjk-all 4.8.5-1
ii latexdiff 1.3.2-1
ii latexmk 1:4.77-1
ii lcdf-typetools 2.108-3
ii lmodern 2.005-1
ii prerex 6.8.0-1
ii psutils 1.17.dfsg-4
ii purifyeps 1.1-3
ii t1utils 1.41-4
ii tex-gyre 20180621-3.1
ii texinfo 6.8-6
ii texlive-base 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-bibtex-extra 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-binaries 2022.20220321.62855-4
ii texlive-extra-utils 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-font-utils 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-fonts-extra 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-fonts-extra-doc 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-fonts-extra-links 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-fonts-recommended 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-fonts-recommended-doc 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-formats-extra 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-games 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-humanities 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-humanities-doc 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-lang-arabic 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-chinese 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-cjk 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-cyrillic 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-czechslovak 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-english 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-european 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-french 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-german 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-greek 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-italian 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-japanese 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-korean 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-other 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-polish 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-portuguese 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-lang-spanish 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-latex-base 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-latex-base-doc 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-latex-extra 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-latex-extra-doc 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-latex-recommended 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-latex-recommended-doc 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-luatex 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-metapost 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-metapost-doc 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-music 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-pictures 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-pictures-doc 2022.20220722-1
ii texlive-plain-generic 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-pstricks 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-pstricks-doc 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-publishers 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-publishers-doc 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-science 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-science-doc 2022.20220722-2
ii texlive-xetex 2022.20220722-1
ii tipa 2:1.3-21
ii vprerex 1:6.5.1-1+b2
texlive-full recommends no packages.
Versions of packages texlive-full suggests:
pn xindy <none>
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii dpkg 1.21.9
ii ucf 3.0043
Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
pn debhelper <none>
Versions of packages texlive-full is related to:
ii tex-common 6.17
ii texlive-binaries 2022.20220321.62855-4
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2022.20220923-1
Am 26.09.2022 um 10:07 teilte Harald Jele mit:
Hi Harald,
when installing texlive-full into debian testing the EB Garmond fonts seem to
be not installed correctly. Not all ligatures are available, the bold face does
not even have a dash ...
I put a minimal example to
http://wwwu.aau.at/hjele/texlive_vs_debian_testing/wut.zip
This seems to have been solved in latest TL upload. This TL snapshot is
currently settings in Debian unstable and won't migrate into testing,
until the incompatibility to latexml has been solved.
I'm closing the bug here.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
