Your message dated Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:47:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326951: libofx2: installation failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 20:43:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 13:43:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECkHU-0005G0-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:43:00 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 60CDC1FFFFC3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:42:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.alphacent.com
(LAubervilliers-151-11-55-32.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.91.32])
by mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3F9A71FFFFB4
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:42:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [192.168.1.50] (mts78-2-82-239-221-235.fbx.proxad.net
[82.239.221.235])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.alphacent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C16E7D53
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:42:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:42:26 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Schneider?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libofx2: installation failed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libofx2
Version: 0.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: package uninstallable
This bug look like the #326721, but it's not the same, because it's not a
conflict with liboxf1c2. But another one :
# apt-get install libofx2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libofx2
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/571kB of archives.
After unpacking 4133kB of additional disk space will be used.
(Reading database ... 152856 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libofx2 (from .../libofx2_1%3a0.8.0-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libofx2_1%3a0.8.0-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libofx.so.2.0.0', which is also in
package libofx1c2
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libofx2_1%3a0.8.0-3_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326951-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 00:47:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 17:47:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECo6P-00013w-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:47:49 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECo6N-0005Nh-W2; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:47:48 -0700
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#326951: libofx2: installation failed
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: More than enough rope.
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:47:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (=?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?=
Schneider's message of "Tue,
06 Sep 2005 22:42:26 +0200")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: libofx2
> Version: 0.8.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: package uninstallable
>
> This bug look like the #326721, but it's not the same, because it's not a
> conflict with liboxf1c2. But another one :
...
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libofx2_1%3a0.8.0-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libofx.so.2.0.0', which is also in=20
> package libofx1c2
...
Um, yes, it is just the same "conflict" with a buggy version of
libofx1c2.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
