Hi all! On 5 Oct 2001, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Yes, please don't try making a change to base like this at this point > in the freeze. It's just going to have to be a problem we have in > woody. busybox package needs to be tuned to boot-floppies use -- it > might be inconvenient to others but we just need to make comprimises > here so things keep moving forward quickly enough. Yes I do agree that such a change would just mean some more work (as if there is not enough to be done yet). Still I think having a busybox package available with all functions built in would be nice. So, why not building a busybox-all package that has everything built in? Kind regards, Jens -- Wenn der Prophet nicht zum Berg kommt, muss der Berg zum Propheten kommen. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
