On Tue Oct 02, 2001 at 06:58:47PM -0700, David Kimdon wrote: > I just completed an install with a reduced busybox. We are now using > route and ifconfig from busybox (no bb ash, see below). Comparing new > and old, mounted via loop. > > /home/dwhedon/new 3415 2501 914 74% /new > /home/dwhedon/old 3414 2634 780 78% /old > > That's uncompressed savings, BTW.
So Adam, is it agreeable that I upload a version of busybox to the main archive with these changes? David has now validated that this is viable and saves space. > I couldn't get bb ash to work properly, segfault (Bug #114260). I'll dig into this and find the problem -- but I will leave ash out for the time being. -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], formerly of Lineo --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
