On 08/12/2011, at 10:36 AM, Chris Corbyn wrote: > I don't believe it's possible to have a perfect abstraction that prevents you > from using SQL while still supporting all the features of SQL.
This is false - as a counter-example, CQL already does this. It's not yet fully implemented, but the language is built on the fact-oriented approach which encompasses and extends everything available in SQL. Clifford Heath. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
