Hallöchen! Most things have been sorted out.
Torsten Bronger writes: > [...] > > 1. Calling colprof without the "-u" parameter means that the white > patch (with L=90.45 in my case) is converted to L=1 after the > colorin module. This makes the image brighter. However, the > standard colour matrix doesn't do this. Pascal explained to me that for internal colour matrices, DT does the autoexposure, so only for private profiles, the "-u" is useful. > [...] > > 2. Exporting with "colorimetric (absolute)" means that the white > patch becomes yellowish. All other colour intents work properly > as far as I can see. I have "always littlecms2" activated. If I > deactivate it, there is never a colour shift. I think the yellowing is correct. The question remains: Why does DT behave different here? > 3. The quality of the ICC seems to be suprisingly poor. It seemed poor to me because I checked a deeply blue patch. Bad idea. The colour profiles -- my own, the Adobe profile, and the new "enhanced matrix", are not far away from each other, and all three are good. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: [email protected] or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
