On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Markus Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 21.12.2012 20:34, schrieb Pascal de Bruijn: >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Am Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012, 15:07:36 schrub Pascal de Bruijn: >>>> Hi, >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>>> It seems that we are currently moving our XMP data verbatim into >>>> exported files, even thought most of the data in that XMP has no added >>>> value for exported files. >>> >>> We do that on purpose so you know what you did to get the result (you could >>> probably even recreate the xmp sidecar from the data attached). >> >> But what's the value of including that in the JPEG? >> >> You're keeping the XMPs with the RAWs. And if you nolonger have the >> RAW the XMP is useless anyhow. > > It might serve as some backup to restore an old history stack from an > exported JPEG after you have changed/dropped it? > RAW + JPEG => History Stack/XMP recovery
In that line of thought, we might want to try embedding the full RAW into all exported JPEGs then :D > (Yes, this is a very, very special use case ...) Haha :) Regards, Pascal de Bruijn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
