http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> --- (In reply to Johannes Pfau from comment #5) > Oh, and back to topic: > > > I am quite open to solutions, other than I don't think 'volatile' as a > > keyword > would be something reintroduced to the language am afaid. > > Yes, that's what I fear as well. But thinking about it volatility is a > property of the memory location and that best maps to a type qualifier. > (It's not exactly the same thing, but we also have this conflation for > immutable type / read only memory and in practice it should work fine). > If we are going for property, maybe @volatile might end up standing. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
