On 18 December 2013 14:29, Daniel Kozak <kozz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is this a bug, by design, a temporary convenience? Please advise and >> offer your suggestions? > > > IMHO it is not a bug. Even static arrays are dynamically allocated and then > convert to static. >
Not anymore, they are not. It makes no sense to dynamically allocate static arrays as they are passed around by value anyway...
