On 7 September 2013 00:17, Ramon <s...@thanks.no> wrote: > - It's not as consistent as I'd like it to be. phobos seems, uhm, worthy a > discussion e.g. concerning at least its design (e.g. layers, OS interface), > safety has been a concern but might have profitted by learning more from > other languages, etc. Similarly there are bits all over the place but very > little consistently implemented. That's another example why I value Iains > work so emminently; he has brought us a complete and (at least principally) > portable toolchain incl. debugging which is a conditio sine qua non.
You can thank GNU for that portable toolchain too... :o) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
