On 16 March 2012 22:50, Artur Skawina <art.08...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/16/12 13:30, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> On 16 March 2012 11:33, Artur Skawina <art.08...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 03/12/12 16:35, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>>> I'm picking up some old issues from bugzilla, this one is worth >>>> having a community review. >>>> >>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1949 >>>> >>>> >>>> Should hidden GCC features be imported from a magic module >>>> provided by gcc.* packages - or should the implementation be >>>> re-written using pragmas instead? >>> >>> Well, what's the definition of "hidden" here? The access to "std" stuff >>> (varargs, intrinsics etc) might be done via pragmas in magic GCC modules, >>> but many user-accessible things need to be exposed via pragmas anyway. >>> And they need to be accessible from D - eg: how do you set GCCs align >>> attribute from D?... [1] >>> >> >> By using align(). :-) >> >>> artur >>> >>> [1] via pragmas; D's "align" does not count. >> >> :-( >> >> pragma(attribute) or pragma(set_attribute) are the second door in. You >> need to lookup GCC's documentation on Declaration and Type attributes >> for the exact names. > > The problem is the "align", which happens to be a D keyword... > > I was concerned about other such issues with pragmas. > > artur
It accepts both forms of attribute names. That is align and __align__. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
