On 03/16/12 13:30, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 16 March 2012 11:33, Artur Skawina <art.08...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 03/12/12 16:35, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>> I'm picking up some old issues from bugzilla, this one is worth >>> having a community review. >>> >>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1949 >>> >>> >>> Should hidden GCC features be imported from a magic module >>> provided by gcc.* packages - or should the implementation be >>> re-written using pragmas instead? >> >> Well, what's the definition of "hidden" here? The access to "std" stuff >> (varargs, intrinsics etc) might be done via pragmas in magic GCC modules, >> but many user-accessible things need to be exposed via pragmas anyway. >> And they need to be accessible from D - eg: how do you set GCCs align >> attribute from D?... [1] >> > > By using align(). :-) > >> artur >> >> [1] via pragmas; D's "align" does not count. > > :-( > > pragma(attribute) or pragma(set_attribute) are the second door in. You > need to lookup GCC's documentation on Declaration and Type attributes > for the exact names.
The problem is the "align", which happens to be a D keyword... I was concerned about other such issues with pragmas. artur
