On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I think the master branch is good enough for at least a 0.21 alpha. Are >>>> there any pending changes that should go in before it can be released? Any >>>> pull requests that should be considered? >>> >>> I started some work on support for static methods (for c++ and cdef >>> classes). I'll see if I can wrap this up and create a pull request. >>> >>>> We should get this in, I think: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/284 >>>> >>>> And the gdb tests are still broken. >>>> >>>> Robert, could you take a look through the Sage test failures? Most of them >>>> might be issues in Sage rather than Cython, but it's better to make sure we >>>> can either fix or safely ignore them. >>> >>> Yeah, I'll take a look at those. >> >> Not all of them look benign. I'm updating Sage to the latest release >> and will see what's goin on. > > The two remaining cmdline.py tests look inocuous, we should be good on > that front (though I'll try to get this clean again).
All sage tests are passing now (the weren't Cython issues). - Robert _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
