On 25 January 2012 12:00, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: > mark florisson, 25.01.2012 11:43: >> On 25 January 2012 01:27, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, mark florisson wrote: >>>> It's been almost three months since we talked about a 0.16 release, I >>>> think it's quite ready. It would already be a big release, it would be >>>> good to see how people like it, and to catch any issues etc before we >>>> pile on more features. >>> >>> I would love to do a release soon. Last time this came up, I think the >>> big issue was (compilation) performance regression. Has this been >>> adequately addressed? >> >> Sort of. Basically if you don't use memoryviews it will be as fast as >> it used to be, otherwise there is about a 3 second constant time >> overhead (on my machine). >> >>> The other issue is that there are a couple of >>> doctest failures with Sage. One source of problems is decorators due >>> to the (ugly) disallowing of function re-declarations, I'll try look >>> into this one. There are also a huge number of segfaults (see the >>> bottom of >>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/ext-libs/job/sage-tests/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/log.txt >>> ) which we need to get to the bottom of. >> >> Oh I see. I suppose to try it out under a debugger one would have to >> compile the whole of sage from source? > > It might be easier to log into sage.math, go to the sage build directory > that Jenkins uses and do some experiments there. It's in > > /levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/ > > Stefan > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
Ah, neat, thanks. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
