On 25 January 2012 01:27, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, mark florisson > <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hey, >> >> It's been almost three months since we talked about a 0.16 release, I >> think it's quite ready. It would already be a big release, it would be >> good to see how people like it, and to catch any issues etc before we >> pile on more features. > > I would love to do a release soon. Last time this came up, I think the > big issue was (compilation) performance regression. Has this been > adequately addressed?
Sort of. Basically if you don't use memoryviews it will be as fast as it used to be, otherwise there is about a 3 second constant time overhead (on my machine). > The other issue is that there are a couple of > doctest failures with Sage. One source of problems is decorators due > to the (ugly) disallowing of function re-declarations, I'll try look > into this one. There are also a huge number of segfaults (see the > bottom of > https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/ext-libs/job/sage-tests/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/log.txt > ) which we need to get to the bottom of. Oh I see. I suppose to try it out under a debugger one would have to compile the whole of sage from source? > - Robert > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel