John Young said:
> Uni wrote:
>
> >Not at all what I am talking about. But then again, I've never been
> >disappointed (with noted exceptions) by the inability to read
> displayed by
> >the masses of this list.
>
> Let us remain calm at Uni's mock taunt. We know cypherpunks *write*
> code, they do not read, period, knowing full well, as Uni does, that it's
> a time waster.
For the record, I was generally addressing those list members who, by and
large, are a waste of bandwidth. I pretty much assumed the regulars in here
(you know who you are) and contributors like Mr. Young would (rightly)
consider themselves above such criticism.
