Uni wrote:

>Not at all what I am talking about.  But then again, I've never been
>disappointed (with noted exceptions) by the inability to read displayed by
>the masses of this list.

Let us remain calm at Uni's mock taunt. We know cypherpunks *write*
code, they do not read, period, knowing full well, as Uni does, that it's 
a time waster.

Cypherpunks also*crack* code, but without reading it, how silly, for if
code could be read it would be protected by the US First Amendment
and thereby free of pernicious export controls.

So remember, whatever cypherpunks may taunt, do not read, repeat
do not read, that is forbidden, and you might be killed for it, and, for
that matter, might be killed for a thousand other reasons often listed
right here, not that anyone would ever read such a list.

Finally, recall that power comes out of the barrel of a gun, and if
you want great wisdom eat gun barrels. First remove the bullets
or you'll lose your wisdom container, and thereafter your sense
of place in the universe, the place in the volume you were
attempting to decipher (not read, goddamit), and never find
the directions to the cypherpunk meeting where people debate
fine points of breathtaking illiteracy.

My .02 sents wart.

Reply via email to