>On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 19:25:57 -0500, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>
>>It is very simple, libertarians don't care *who* owns what. If the small
>>farmer can't compete in the open market, the so be it. I woun't shed one
>>more tear than I would over the demise of the buggy whip industry.
>
>If an economy controlled by increasingly few corporations doesn't
>raise a red flag for you, then you're a sucker. The
>future will prove one of us right, me.
It would raise a red flag if it were true.
There is really one one portion of the economy where there
are fewer and fewer people in control--the "traditional" media, TV,
Newspaper, Radio, and Magazine.
Of course, the Facists Comminications Commission, in a rather
startling move, and against industry recommendations is opening
licensing of low-wattage community radio stations once again. I
wonder how this happened, and if it was just a ploy to get more
bribes from the Industry.
In most other industries, from motorcycles and cars to
microchips and software, there are more and more corporations pushing
product than ever before.
>
>>What signifies you as a socialist is that you see no problem with having
>>the government *steal* my property to "fix" wh...
>
>I keep telling you suckers that I'm a communist, not a socialist. Get a clue.
Same thing.
--
A quote from Petro's Archives: **********************************************
If the courts started interpreting the Second Amendment the way they interpret
the First, we'd have a right to bear nuclear arms by now.--Ann Coulter
