On Nov 28 11:20, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Nov 28 10:09, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> Christopher Faylor, le Thu 27 Nov 2008 21:18:23 -0500, a ?crit : > >> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:16:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> > >There is no sem_unlink function, is there a reason or is that a PTW? > >> > > >> > PTC. It's not easy to get right in a Windows environment. If I read > >> > what's required correctly it could require interprocess communication. > >> > >> Mmm, I haven't tested (and can't right now), but does that mean that > >> even if sem_open() is currently provided, it does not work? > > > >The POSIX semaphore implementation is incomplete in terms of named > >semaphores up to Cygwin 1.5.25. Cygwin 1.7.0 provides all functions, > >including sem_unlink. > > Sorry for the misinformation. I completely missed the sem_unlink that > was right there on my screen.
No worries. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
