On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Nov 28 10:09, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> Christopher Faylor, le Thu 27 Nov 2008 21:18:23 -0500, a ?crit : >> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:16:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> > >There is no sem_unlink function, is there a reason or is that a PTW? >> > >> > PTC. It's not easy to get right in a Windows environment. If I read >> > what's required correctly it could require interprocess communication. >> >> Mmm, I haven't tested (and can't right now), but does that mean that >> even if sem_open() is currently provided, it does not work? > >The POSIX semaphore implementation is incomplete in terms of named >semaphores up to Cygwin 1.5.25. Cygwin 1.7.0 provides all functions, >including sem_unlink.
Sorry for the misinformation. I completely missed the sem_unlink that was right there on my screen. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
