On Oct 31 16:19, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2008-10-31 14:50, skrev Corinna Vinschen:
>> On Oct 31 07:26, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> But yes, it might be nice if cygwin used the same type as Linux, as we
>>> claim to strive for Linux source compatibility.
>> Why exactly? The important thing here is that int32_t is 32 bit wide,
>> regardless of using int or long as base type.
>
> I some projects I'm involved with there's quite a bit of the following:
>
> $ cat int.c
> #include <stdio.h>
> int
> main(void)
> {
> int32_t i = 32;
> printf("%d", i);
> return 0;
> }
> $ gcc -c -Wall int.c
> int.c: In function `main':
> int.c:6: warning: int format, int32_t arg (arg 2)
> int.c:6: warning: int format, int32_t arg (arg 2)
>
> What should the format specifier be to not have that warning
> on neither Cygwin nor Linux? (or anywhere for that matter)
printf("%ld", (long) i);
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
