On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:36:26PM -0800, infoterror wrote: >Christopher Faylor-2 wrote: >>My second paragraph was stating that I didn't understand how you could >>come to the conclusion that only schools are keeping cygwin alive since >>there are clearly many messages from companies on this mailing list. >>This does not in any way attack your character or appeal to special >>interests. It is a simple statement of fact. > >You forget that the users use what tools they have, but if something >better comes along, they replace them. You've been given good advice >here by multiple users, and reasons why, and you've responded to it >with pathological argumentation. I don't know if I can help you, but >if you're willing to set up a debate with a mediator, I'll demonstrate >logic to you. > >The world doesn't care about your drama. It cares about tools. I know >many people in the Open Source movement, like many in closed source >development, care about providing quality tools to their users (and >many closed sourcers give 'em away free, like EditPadLite and PuTTy). >I don't know why you're fighting the messenger instead of paying >attention to the message, and I can only assume the "the problem is >between the screen and the chair." > >I am a professional, and a logician, and if I seem terse, it's that I >don't take kindly to having my time wasted by people who do not >understand logical argument and are not emotionally stable enough to >accept logic. > >Best,
Dude, deluded much? Since you haven't been able to come up with any cygwin-specific information (or any information really), I'm declaring this topic over. If you want to continue in this vein, use cygwin-talk. This is your only warning. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
