Christopher Faylor-2 wrote:
>
> Since you haven't been able to come up with any cygwin-specific
> information (or any information really), I'm declaring this topic over.
> If you want to continue in this vein, use cygwin-talk. This is your
> only warning.
>
I'm sorry you're having a tantrum. For those of us with a background in
logical argument, what's happened here is obvious and typical. We're
speaking different languages, and you've made no effort to understand what
I'm saying because you take it as a personal insult that someone dare
suggest your project could use some additions. This is all-too typical in
IT. Good luck in your quest for maturity and logical coherence.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7124473
Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
