On Apr 1 13:05, Vincent Dedun wrote: > So I hope you wouldn't mind I attached a short testing program you can > easily compil with gcc to reproduce the bug.
Cool, that's exactly what I was asking for. I was immediately able to reproduce the problem and it turned out, that on fork() the socket duplication from parent to child process for some reason occupied space in the child, which in the parent is occupied by the shared memory returned by shmat. Consequentially the duplication of the shared memory couldn't occupy the same address as in the parent. That's a fatal error so the forked child terminated itself with error 487, which basically means "Invalid address". I've changed fork() so that the shared memory is duplicated before sockets are duplicated, which is ok because sockets don't have special requirements for memory addresses. That works fine for me, but it would be good if you could test the next snapshot, which I just uploaded, nevertheless. It's just incredible that nobody found this problem before. Again, thanks for the testcase, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
