On Apr 4 08:52, Vincent Dedun wrote: > However, semaphores still doesn't work properly. > There is no more problem with semop not waiting, but with quick > semaphores locking unlocking. > > I attach a new testcase, which is the same as previous one, except each > child task will lock the semaphore, wait 100ms, then release the > semaphore and die. Each time a child dies, a new one is created to keep > 10 running childs.
I'm wondering, since you're building Cygwin from source anyway, if you're not interested to debug this further or even track it down to its source? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[email protected] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
