On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 04:26:03PM -0500, Robb, Sam wrote: >> But beyond curiosity, there's not many reasons to install and >> use both, at least concurrently. Cygwin and SFU both address >> the same needs and Cygwin covers a wider range of tools. We'll >> see what happens though. > >One thing that Cygwin does lack, and SFU has, is an NFS client :-/ >I know that alone will probably entice me into taking a look at >SFU.
It would be rather interesting to add nfs to cygwin. We could develop filesystem "plug-ins" which could be generalized for stuff like NFS, EXTFS, etc. Didn't someone say they had a free month? Perfect project. :-) cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
