At 04:26 PM 1/14/2004, Robb, Sam you wrote: >> But beyond curiosity, there's not many reasons to install and >> use both, at least concurrently. Cygwin and SFU both address >> the same needs and Cygwin covers a wider range of tools. We'll >> see what happens though. > >One thing that Cygwin does lack, and SFU has, is an NFS client :-/ >I know that alone will probably entice me into taking a look at >SFU.
Right. That's always intrigued me as well. If you look more closely at any or all parts of SFU, with or without Cygwin, I'm sure the list would be interested in the results of your analysis. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
