Yeah,it seems all ok! >On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:24:29PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:44:20AM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote: >>>zhouxin wrote: >>>>If the udp worker's count greater than 18,some thread's select() hang >>>>and process take 100 cpu: >>> >>>Interestingly, there is a static pool of 18 threads internally before >>>switching to dynamically created threads. So there may be some problem >>>related to the dynamically allocated threads code. >> >>Hmm. Interesting observation. I took a stab at fixing a couple of >>obvious problems in the thread overflow code. It seems like it might >>have solved the problem. >> >>There will be a new snapshot available in an hour or so at: >> >>http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ >> >>Thanks for the test case, btw. > >So... did the snapshot fix the problem? > >cf > >-- >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > >.
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
