On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:24:29PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:44:20AM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote: >>zhouxin wrote: >>>If the udp worker's count greater than 18,some thread's select() hang >>>and process take 100% cpu: >> >>Interestingly, there is a static pool of 18 threads internally before >>switching to dynamically created threads. So there may be some problem >>related to the dynamically allocated threads code. > >Hmm. Interesting observation. I took a stab at fixing a couple of >obvious problems in the thread overflow code. It seems like it might >have solved the problem. > >There will be a new snapshot available in an hour or so at: > >http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > >Thanks for the test case, btw.
So... did the snapshot fix the problem? cf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
