On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Btw, I was trying to move this discussion off of the public list because >>it probably isn't of much interest to people there. > >Well, .. > >The Red Hat Cygwin Product pages are marvelously content-free when it >comes to cost and content (i.e. which version) information.
They are not content-free of contact information, though. >Other mixed-license products (MySQL, etc.) are quite up-front about >licensing requirements, costs and versions supported commercially, with >exhaustive detail in their web pages. Perhaps Red Hat can be a little >more explicit on their pages? Just click on the contact Red Hat site. Cygwin is not MySQL. That should be fairly obvious. The licensing issues are much trickier. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
