Christopher Faylor wrote:
Btw, I was trying to move this discussion off of the public list becauseWell, ..
it probably isn't of much interest to people there.
The Red Hat Cygwin Product pages are marvelously content-free when it comes to cost and content (i.e. which version) information.
Other mixed-license products (MySQL, etc.) are quite up-front about licensing requirements, costs and versions supported commercially, with exhaustive detail in their web pages. Perhaps Red Hat can be a little more explicit on their pages?
--
Shankar.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
